1. I will be trying to use the experience of a historical event, situation or issue.
2. The issue that i will deal with is the US policy implemented under Ronald Regan called the 600 ship navy. This plan was meant to increase the size of the US navy in order to increase strength and but strategic pressure on the Soviet Union.
The relevance to me is that one of the Iowa class battleships brought out of mothballs was the USS Wisconsin which my grandfather served on during World War Two and the Korean War. Also the Naval Base at Mayport Florida is 19 miles from my home in Fernandina Beach. The school i attended in Jacksonville is situated on the oppositie bank directly across from a large Naval Air Station as well.
3. The conventional thinking on this subject was that Regan was instrumental in ending the cold war. He was able to do this through massive spending increases especially on the miliitary that the Soviets could not match. The 600 ship navy program was one such policy. The soviets attempt to match US military spending ulitmatley pushed the communist economy over the edge and resulted in the demise of that regimne.
4. The argumentive position would be to evaluate the effectivness of the Regan policy. Researching and debating such questions as: How much did US increase spending? How much did Soviet spending increase? What were the condition of both economies at the time? What was the state of both navies at the time? When did the navy program end? What did the program really accomplish? Answering these questions would lead to a thesis supporting or decrying Regans Policy.
5. One area that i believe that is often overlooked when people make the claim that Regan’s spending on military ended the cold war was the fact that the Soviet economy was already teaternig on the edge of collapse. Possibly Regan did not contribute as much as everyone
6. CATT- method, memory, experience, perspective
7. Certinatly need to refashion Regan and Gorbachev both leaders have been warped by doxa significantly. Farmily connection would be my grandfather but that is a bit tenious.
8. One obvious trap is to not rely too heavily on established consensus thought. The idea that regan won the cold war is so ingrained that even scholarly material is heavily influnced by group think. A clearer view of the world not based on the ideologies and prejudices of the cold war is required.